« Reorientation II | Main | In the Book Review »

Incomplete

Changing my mind on the adoption issue has unleashed a lot of strong sentiment. Giving up one one lie - refusing to regard the American way of adoption, between World War II and Roe v Wade, as anything but monstrous - seems to have set off at least one other sudden switch. It's about the acceptability of American football.

I can understand wanting to play a game, dimly. Whether my poor hand/eye coordination is innate or inane doesn't much matter. I used to like to play Monopoly, but now I'm afraid that it would bore me to death, and the "original edition" set that I bought a few years ago remains shrink-wrapped. I don't relate well to games. And exertion for its own sake puzzles me. My fondness for conversational ballroom dancing might be a pointer to the kind of physical activity that appeals to me. I like to dance, but not with someone I'm not talking to.

I can't understand sitting and watching other people play a game. I can fake it. I can talk about crowds projecting themselves upon the teams that they're rooting for. But what's the point? I still don't get it.

So: I don't have a favorite sport. I'm absolutely indifferent to sports. I'm neutral.

Except, I'm not. I'm not indifferent to football. All the grace of a completed forward pass cannot redeem what is essentially a brutal game that domesticates violence. It doesn't transcend violence, as, say, basketball does. Football simply harnesses it to the line of scrimmage, and sauve qui peut.

Having received two degrees from the University of Notre Dame, I know a thing or two about the sociology of football. In my undergraduate career, I went to no games after my freshman year. As a law student, however, I went to most of the home games, because it was a hoot to sit with classmates and carry on. I'd have been perfectly happy if the teams had been playing soccer.

Why weren't they? What does that say? How can we be complacent about what's going on in the field?

Discretion forbids my discussing the background of this unforeseen enlightenment, but I can say that it has upset the foundations of an important friendship. That's why I am writing this. This entry is not an argument against football. It is simply a form of notice. Your elation about a football victory is only going to excite my disgust.  

 

Comments

WOW RJ, DO YOU RECALL 1949 WHEN MY PURDUE WHOMPPED YOUR ND ENDING A VERY LONG WINNING STRING, NEWLY MARRIED PAULINE AND I HAD JUST ARRIVED AT LAFAYETTE FOR THE JOYOUS CELEBRATION, WE LOST THE NEXT GAMES TILL THE FINALE WITH I.U SO AT LEAST WE WERE STATE CHAMPS, KEEP HAPPY

WOW RJ, I BET YOU DIDN'T EXPECT that RESPONSE!

I love sports, but have never gotten 'football.' Nothing goes on!!! Oh, yes, the occasional 'Hail, Mary' enlivens the occasional game, but generally it is alot of grunting and pushing and shoving, along with the lamentable habit of trying to mutilate the QB. I don't know if I find it violent per se, with all the padding and equipment, but rather I get bored watching 300lb behemoths pushing each other around the field.

A one hour game now takes 3 1/2 hours on television. With a stopwatch handy, I'd bet there's not 10 minutes of real action. Case closed.

Give me the holy three of baseball, golf and tennis. Played all three, love watching them, think baseball is the most beautiful of them all.....

I think those of us who played sports constantly as children, (in my case thru college and then on amateur teams) and fantasized about being a pro golfer or catcher or tennis bum can watch the sports we love because of the identification with what we know and played. Of course there tennis fans who never played the game, but familiarity makes it easier and contributes to my ability, for example, to sit contentedly and watch sports (but not football.)

I am a kottke.org micropatron

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2