« Current Reading | Main | Sick Day »

Idomeneo Fallout

The news from the Deutsche Oper Berlin will make everybody crazy for a while, but I hope that something can be learned from the episode. Two things, actually.

First: it's time for opera directors to stop fooling around with operas, to refrain from changing the period of their settings and adding gratuitous (silent) bits just to make some sort of "point." The only point that opera has is beautiful singing that is also psychologically true, and the visual aspects of the experience are distinctly subordinate to the auditory. Every now and then, there's a true spectacle, but for the most part operas speak vividly to the blind - as thousands of opera lovers who have never actually seen an opera can attest. Larding a production of Mozart's Idomeneo - which tells a story related to the Homeric epics - with the severed heads of major religious figures (Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, and the opera's own deus, Poseidon) is simply flabbifying.

Second, and much more important: it's time for a time-out on Western-Muslim critiques. Notice that I do not say "Christian-Muslim," for this is very definitely a post-religious argument on one side. Or, better, an argument about whether there can be a post-religious discussion at all. There is indeed a clash of cultures going on, even if it's not quite the one that Samuel Huntington writes about.

What's at issue is the right of an individual to determine his or her own sexual life. The sooner we all come to see this, the quicker we'll get to where we need to be next. Muslims deny the right, as human beings have done for most of their existence. The Western recognition of the right remains provisional: many in the West - many in the United States - do not recognize it. We need to consolidate our side of the argument, coming to terms with Westerners who persist in patriarchy. Until the West works out a deal with patriarchalists, whether by granting them a geographical territory in which to practice their beliefs, or, as sometimes seems likely, by simply reverting to patriarchy itself, we have no business spreading "democracy," which, currently in the West, necessarily means equal rights in most secular matters for women.

A good place to start would be convincing Europe's Muslim leaders that members of their flocks have the right to reject Islam, while at the same time allowing behaviors, such as the wearing of head scarves, that are obviously more cultural than religious in nature. The hard but more essential place to start is finding jobs for all those North African kids.

Comments

The behavior of the Deutsche Oper Berlin just emboldens the radical fringe to impose more and more fear of retribution on the West for the slightest perceived slight. Why was Benedict forced to constantly explain himself? On the other side, it makes me shake my head when the head of the Simon Weisenthal Center complains, that after 2 public apologies, he is still waiting for that moron Mel Gibson to be more forthcoming to him.

Everyone should just shut up and stop being hurt about every real or perceived slight. And face the fact that religion has caused more hatred and death than any politlcal force in history. It should be practiced in private as a matter of conscience and not forced on us by radical elements either in or out of this country.

In some ways I am glad I won't be around to see how this plays out many years from now : the increasing social/economic/religious fractiousness in this country, the inability of the West, long imperial and imperious, to deal with the upcoming economic might of China and India and our loss of power, economically or politically. And the lack of vision on both sides in dealing with the religious issues is startling.

Either the Opera should have put it on with its directorial impudence, to take a stand, or revise the production, which companies do all the time. By not putting it on at all, Deutsche Oper has handed extremism another victory.

There is a deep tension between toleration and freedom, two ideals that [ought to] shape and direct our modern Western societies. I believe that there is a degree of primacy that we can lend to our principle of freedom, because it is ultimately what informs our notions of toleration. We value tolerance because we understand that persons have certain rights, one of which is the capacity to frame and pursue their own conceptions of the good life. This is a very nuanced way of saying that we respect one another's liberty. Assigning this status to liberty, however, does not resolve the tension.

The clash between the Western and Islamic worlds underscores this. The immediate and absolute reverence that religious thought enjoys makes it impossible to engage in constructive dialogue about religious beliefs as social phenomena, whose content is subject to reflection. Beliefs are allowed to wreak havoc on society without open critique. This will pose an ever increasing danger to humanity if left unchecked.

I am a kottke.org micropatron

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2