« Record Craze | Main | Doubtless Bigots »

Never Let Me Go

It is much too soon to write intelligently about Kazuo Ishiguro's overwhelming new book, Never Let Me Go (Knopf, 2005). When I opened the novel this morning, I knew what narrator's classmates were in for, but if ever there was a novel that is not about what it is "about," this is the one, and to discuss the book's real significance, the wellsprings of its greatness, requires completely spoiling the suspense - which for me was enormous, even if I "knew." I didn't know. You can't know until you've read the book. Then you can talk about it. Then I can talk about it. Fine as The Remains of the Day is, Never Let Me Go is a masterpiece.

Mr Ishiguro is a writer of immense precision, but this is the first time, to my mind, that he has completely synchronized his precision with his objectives in such a way that the latter are always made clear. As the tone deepens and the "horror movie stuff" looms menacingly, it becomes apparent - palpable, actually - that this is a mightily redemptive book about the mortality that faces us all, not the freak show that it might have been. The publishers (if not the author himself) must have followed the agony of Terri Schiavo with nervous incredulity. No sooner do we shake off the aftermath of that creepy affair than we're deluged by an even more powerful wave from the same salt sea.

It should be noted that, if Never Let Me Go might be considered a work of science fiction, that fiction has been set to tell not of something that might happen in the future, but of omething that might have happened in the past; Mr Ishiguro has dyed his novel in colors that are complete familiar and even somewhat passé.

The title is taken from an old pop song. It might just as well have been taken from Brahms's Song of Destiny.

Putting off writing completely and candidly about this book would drive me mad. Consider this a "spoiler alert" - don't follow this link to Portico if you don't want to know the true dimensions of Never Let Me Go.

Comments

Consarn it, I already know what it's about from the damned NZ capsule reviews. Still, it's on my short list; I love Ishiguro.

A recent New York Times review also did a nice job of spoiling the suspense. I've always wondered why critics feel the need to do that; in my opinion, any critic that elects to do so should put a bold-face disclaimer at the front of the piece to the effect that one should not read further if one doesn't want to know the ending. But I'm still going to read the book as I, too, love Ishiguro, even The Unconsoled; at times, I wanted to throw that book across the room, but I couldn't stop reading it.

RJ: I have finished Never Let Me Go; I don't want to ruin the book for anyone who hasn't read it, but would you start a dialogue on Good For You? There are so many things in the book that should be discussed.

Good For You is for classics - or at least for works that have been around for a while. Much as I - your encomium here - Never Let Me Go, I think it would be presumptuous to discuss the book alongside The Ambassadors and Così fan tutte just now. And so, mindful of spoilers, I'm opening up a new post to comments about the book. I think that the conversation will eventually drift over to Portico, where my full-dress reading of the novel can be found.

I am a kottke.org micropatron

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2