« Gee Wizbang | Main | Extreme Makeover! »

Yikes

When I picked up the Times this morning and saw the latest casualty figures from the Christmas Tsunami, all I could think of was the Wizbang post that I couldn't quite bring myself to write about yesterday; I thought I could get away with mentioning the site and faulting its English. The faultiness of the English is not interesting enough to warrant gawking, and I'm sorry to have suggested (if not in so many words) that reading it would be like listening to Florence Foster Jenkins. What I ought to have remarked upon was the stupidity of Paul-Whoever's post, the gist of which scolded blogs of the left for not "covering" the disaster as broadly as the blogs of the right have, allegedly, done.

I've been writing some, and thinking even more, about the importance of getting to know how the right thinks and why it does so. So I visit a site such as Wizbang with the idea of getting inside another person's mind. How naive! I come away fairly retching, having gotten instead inside the laundry bag full of his old socks.

Here goes: according to one of today's posts at Wizbang, liberals are "blind to irony." They fail to see the hypocrisy of lambasting the President for taking days to make a statement about the CT while failing to fill their own blogs with links to this or that disaster-related site.

This is so perplexing to me that I'm tongue-tied. For my part, I don't think much of lambasting the President for his silence. Every day that he holes up at Crawford is a good day for America. Insofar as "liberals" have used the disaster to point up yet again the President's callousness, I think they've taken a cheap shot. Far better would it be to ignore the man altogether. Complain about the things that he does, but let a glaring halo of silence surround his many lapses. Quietly knit them into a scarf, for a hopeful day at The Hague.

But I still can't reason with Wizbang. To pick up his statements is to be seized by the urge to drop them. By all means, read the stuff for yourself, if you can stand the note of chirpy childishness.

This is what we're up against. Yikes.

Comments

Well spoke, good sir!

Here goes: according to one of today's posts at Wizbang, liberals are "blind to irony." They fail to see the hypocrisy of lambasting the President for taking days to make a statement about the CT while failing to fill their own blogs with links to this or that disaster-related site.
-

Interesting... That's not what I said.
-

I said the same people who are whining because I DARED to question their level of compassion have absolutely no problem questioning the compassion of others.

If you don't see the hypocrisy in that then I guess I can't help you.

You've called a lot of names but you've ignored the central point... Could it be because the truth hurts?

Please provide some instances of such "whining." (While we're on the subject of "calling names"...)

I am of two minds about this horrific diaster. Am I surprised that Bush couldn't be bothered for a few days and left it to his lame-duck Secretary of State? No. Is it better not to have his smirking insincerity on tv and to let him rot in Crawford? Maybe. But there is part of me that wants to be proud of whatever President we have and for him to have stayed silent for one day to assess the horror is one thing, but longer than that is not the leadership I want to see even from him. Clinton would have been front and center and let the world know we were there.

I am a kottke.org micropatron

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2